Google hasn't opened Gemini 4 Argon to the public yet, but some users seem to be getting an early taste anyway. Over the past couple of days, a handful of people on X have shared outputs they believe are from Argon, served to them through A/B tests and quiet routing behind other model names.
One of the first was @leo114119, who posted a one-shot render of a classical Chinese palace complex.
Gemini 4 Argon 1010 晚灰测展示:
— Leo · Building w/ AI (@leo114119) October 10, 2026
账号为JIO的18个月Pro,以下内容均为One-shot模式
中国古典建筑-太和云阙,这效果相当棒啊。。。。。。 pic.twitter.com/Iq0W1O3Utt
The account was a Jio-bundled Gemini Pro plan, and the result looks properly detailed, not the flat, generic output Gemini models were often criticized for. In a follow-up post, the same user shared their theory about what might be happening. They claimed the main account never got the test, while a sub-account added to a family group did. They noted a similar pattern with Opus 5.5 earlier, and attached a fresh Pelican test animation for good measure.
据传:Gemini 4 argon 灰度野路子:(不保真)
— Leo · Building w/ AI (@leo114119) October 11, 2026
号是jio的,主号没有灰度到,加入家庭组的子号灰度到了,是不是这个原因呢,之前opus5.5也是家庭组的子号有主号没有。
有 Gemini Antigravity 和 jio AI pro的用户可以去试试:
附一个最新的鹈鹕测试动图: pic.twitter.com/aNmeuG2Cor
Meanwhile, another X user @auricxofficial posted that Gemini 3.8 Flash was routing to Argon, and that Gemini 3.1 Pro in Antigravity now points to 3.8 Flash under the model ID "gemini-3.8-flash-exp-a". They also shared a screen recording of a 3D shooter game that they made with Argon.
Gemini 4 Argon !! 👀 pic.twitter.com/8sfh21Bwjj
— auricxofficial (@auricxofficial) October 11, 2026
That said, @leo114119 shared a more detailed comparison between Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 3.8 Flash, where the two models built three UI screens for a weather app in HTML for iPhones. Argon's version looks noticeably more polished.
Gemini4 Argon(灰度路由)对比Gemini3.8 Flash 生成 APP UI 测试效果对比:
— Leo · Building w/ AI (@leo114119) October 11, 2026
原始提示词:并排展示三个 iPhone 屏幕:一款天气 App 的首页、15 天预报、空气质量页。文件名为:当前模型名字-当前会话推理等级.html,禁止直接生图
左为Gemini3.8 Flash右为Gemini4 Argon(灰度路由) pic.twitter.com/hiyyjuuuoQ
In case you've been following our coverage, you might recall that we covered early Gemini 4 Pro outputs last month, when leakers described an internal "argon" checkpoint with much better frontend taste. Honestly, we don't know whether Google has made any major improvements since then.
Business Insider has since reported that Barium-B is the checkpoint picked for the public Argon release, while employees are also trying a separate checkpoint called Carbon that reportedly feels close to Opus 5.5 for coding, as we noted when Argon hints emerged alongside the Carbon checkpoint. So what people are seeing on X could be any of these.
If you've been under a rock, Google initially announced Gemini 4 Argon on September 30. Since then, the company has been restricting access to a select group of users. The company claims a state-of-the-art 77.9% on DeepSWE, a test of long software engineering tasks, along with first place on the Vals Index for finance, legal, and tax work and on Zapier's AutomationBench. Its own comparison table also shows Argon trailing Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra on some coding and terminal tests.

These are Google's numbers, so take them with a grain of salt. We'll only know how good Argon really is once people can use it every day.
While the test results are impressive, the company is also making big behind-the-scenes changes. We've seen Antigravity getting ready for Argon with Ultra upgrade prompts, and newer builds now include Argon-only context options of 256K, 512K, and 900K. Google is also working on an Ultra mode for AI Studio Build, though any link to Argon is unconfirmed. Google says paid API customers and AI Ultra subscribers come next, with no date given.
If Google's benchmarks hold up, Argon should compete with Anthropic's Fable 5.1 and OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra. Argon's A/B outputs look promising, but a few screenshots won't settle that fight. For now, it's anyone's guess.